Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta lo-que-se-viene. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta lo-que-se-viene. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 6 de septiembre de 2012

WebRTC: Jennins (cisco) a Kaufman(Skype,Microsoft)

Hay cierta tension en el grupo de trabajo de WebRTC porque un miembro del grupo (empleado de Skype/Microsoft ) , coincidentemente con un buen ritmo de trabajo y proximas implementaciones de WebRTC, envio al grupo una especificacion que "reemplaza" a la actual especificacion en la que estuvieron tabajando durante todo el a#o !
Sin pelos en la lengua, el chair de RTCWeb en la IETF, Cullen Jennings ( empleado de Cisco ) le dijo lo siguiente a Matthew Kaufman (empleado de Skype/Microsoft):


"""
From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)  
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:02:59 +0000
To: Matthew Kaufman  
CC: Stefan Hakansson LK , "public-webrtc@w3.org"  

[...]
As usually, my belief is that Microsoft has a huge financial incentive to create as much delay as possible on all the WebRTC work.
"""

Durisimo!

martes, 1 de febrero de 2011

Hickson - Fielding vis a vis

Que grande este Ian Hickson, tiene la paciencia para discutir tranquila
y logicamente aun cuando lo "bardean" ... en este caso ni mas ni menos
que el "creador" de REST: Roy T. Fielding

From: Ian Hickson
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:10:41 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Roy T. Fielding"
Cc: HTML WG
Message-ID:

[...]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Because not a single expert in the Web standards community that I have
> talked to in the past two years has supported the current work in HTML5.
> The single most common reaction to the features that you have wedged
> into HTML5 is abject laughter and disdain for this process.

Hm, this is in stark contrast to the feedback I have received (from
literally hundreds of people).

It is obviously of critical importance to me that HTML5 addresses the
needs of the wide Web community. Clearly, we have received different
feedback from different parts of this community. I would like to receive
feedback from the the people to which you have been talking. Would it be
possible for you to point me in the right direction to obtain this feedback?
Are there mailing lists where it would be appropriate to request
constructive feedback from these people?

Do you have any suggestions for how we could obtain a representative
sample of people to determine once and for all what fraction of experts in
the Web standards community are in favour of the current direction of
HTML5 and what fraction are opposed to it?


(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Nov/0233.html)

Leyeron el ultimo parrafo? ,,, un maestro :-))

martes, 17 de agosto de 2010

Oracle contra Google por Java en Android

Como para terminar movidito el año.

Algunas opiniones:

Tim Bray (ex Sun, se fue a Google cuando arribo Oracle): F*uck Oracle

James Gosling (creador de Java, ex Sun, se fue a Google cuando arribo Oracle): not a big surprise

Jueces: a estudiar Java y maquinas virtuales :-)

miércoles, 19 de mayo de 2010

Point break?

Introducing WebM, an open web media project

WebM includes:

* VP8, a high-quality video codec we are releasing today under a BSD-style, royalty-free license
* Vorbis, an already open source and broadly implemented audio codec
* a container format based on a subset of the Matroska media container

We want to thank the many industry leaders and web community members who are collaborating on the development of WebM and integrating it into their products [: Mozilla, Opera, Google Chrome, Adobe, and many others

[Jeremy Doig, Engineering Director of video and Mike Jazayeri, Group Product Manager, Google ]

http://webmproject.blogspot.com/2010/05/introducing-webm-open-web-media-project.html

Update 20/05/2010: no todo parecen ser flores: por ejemplo este analisis tecnico de VP8.

sábado, 8 de mayo de 2010

Mas sobre Flash y la Web

Interesante opinion de Ben Ward, a la cual llegue desde Tim Bray, a quien llegue desde Slashdot:


"The web is about content. Everything above that is dressing (perhaps think of the web as fresh bread, perfectly coated in balsamic vinegar and olive oil). The fact that older browsers cannot render all the features of your page but can still provide the content to users is a feature. It’s the most important feature.

The Flash philosophy is opposite. Flash is about a complete experience (singular). It’s about every detail being precisely bevelled into place for every viewer. The consequence of this approach is that it resists the availability of content. The goal of perfect consistent rendering can only be achieved through a single version of this single vendor’s bespoke plug-in. If you need a feature of Flash 10, Flash 9 users must upgrade to see any of your content, not just the new feature.

The Flash approach is anti-content; anti-web. Adobe present the idea that Flash is a superior offering because the entire suite of features, in one big blob, is a compelling development offering. But the reason to write on the web in the first place is to make content available broadly."


( http://benward.me/blog/flash-and-html5 )

viernes, 30 de abril de 2010

Durisimo Steve Jobs con Flash

En su reciente ( fines de Abril/2010 ) press release "Pensamientos sobre Flash"(*), Steve Jobs no se anduvo con pelos en la lengua.

Para muestra vale un boton:

The avalanche of media outlets offering their content for Apple’s mobile devices demonstrates that Flash is no longer necessary to watch video or consume any kind of web content.


(*) http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/

miércoles, 9 de diciembre de 2009

Hechos, trends, predicciones?

Motorola lanza un nuevo smartphone y le pone muchas fichas a Android ( Motorola Droid ).

Samsung lanza Bada... basado en open source y apoya el desarrollo de Enlightenment ( window manager open source de "culto" :-)

Sony-Ericsson lanza XPeria X10 basado en Android y que incluye una plataforma de desarrollo open source que usa estandares y tecnologias web (CSS, Web, Javascript ).

Dell lanza un modelo de netbook ( Mini10v ) que corre Moblin sobre Ubuntu.

Primera presentacion "funcionando" de Google Chrome OS y publicacion del codigo fuente del msmo. chromeOs tendra un file system solo para cache y guardara todo los datos "definitivos" en la Red y cuyas aplicaciones seran todas basadas en estandares y tecnologias Web.

Estan casi saliendo del horno las net/notbooks/tablets con la nueva tecnologia de display de Pixel Qi, que integrara en un solo display la funcionalidad de display para e-readres y display para uso convencional ( video, refresco rapido, etc. ).

Criticadigital.com.ar reemplaza el "banner principal de noticias" version Flash por una version mejorada pero en Javascript ( upa no usa mas flash en el banner, y logico, para que lo usaba ? solo por moda como tantos otros sitios).

Trends/predicciones:

. mercado mobile poniendo muchas fichas a opensource , tecnologias google y linux
. empiezan a ser mas pervasivoslos e-readers ( compras una netbook y es e-reader sin que lo supieras! )
. tecnologias web propietarias empiezan a sentir el peso de HTML5

miércoles, 25 de noviembre de 2009

Upa ! ( sobre HTML5 )

Ian Hickson ( editor de la especificacion de la nueva web :-) dixit:

"This (that people can arbitrarily delay work by disagreeing even when
their arguments are weak) is the biggest difference between decisions
based on opinions (the way the W3C operates), and decisions based on data
and reasoning (the way the WHATWG operates), and is the main reason that
the W3C tends to progress significantly slower than the HTML5 work has
been progressing these past few years."

Palazo para W3C :-))

P.S.: dias despues efectivamente HTML5 paso a estado "Last call for comments" en el WHATWG, mientras que en el W3C todavia no hay un panorama incierto sobre como sigue la cosa. Vamos W3C!! que la web esta esperando !!!

miércoles, 7 de octubre de 2009

Ejemlos de HTML5, SVG, Canvas

Dos ejemplos de avances en HTML

i) http://emacsformacosx.com

ii) http://open.adaptedstudio.com/html5/many-lines/

El primero es una pagina que no usa imagenes. Todo es SVG combinado con CSS y HTML5. Detalles aca.

El segundo es un ejemplo del elemento Canvas ( una de las "estrellas" del HTML5 ).

Por supuesto, la recomendacion de siempre: para poder ver esos links usar un browser moderno, es decir: Chrome, Firefox 3.5 , Opera 10 o Safari 4.

Internet Explorer? nop... no parece estar interesado en el avance de HTML y estandares web , por lo menos por ahora ( sera la reciente tibia e inesperadaparticipacion en el WHATWG un inicio de cambio de actitud? el tiempo dira... )

miércoles, 12 de agosto de 2009

Netbooks con ARM marchando a toda maquina

Se esta calentando el tema netbooks con ARM.

Segun este articulo, dos importantes fabricas de semiconductores: TSMC y UMC, estarian trabajando en Noviembre a capacidad plena debido a la cantidad de ordenes recibidas para fabricar chips que iran en las proximas Netbooks con ARM.

Ojala salgan rapido estas netbooks asi pasamos al 2do stage luego del exitoso comienzo de las EEE PC, Aspire One, Dell Mini, MSI Wind, HP mini, etc. Todas esos modelos venian con Linux ( ahora misteriosamente no se encuentra ninguno con Linux, alguien llamo por telefono o tiro alguna silla? ;-).

Las Netbooks ARM parece que correrian exclusivamente Linux , porque el Windows "tradicional" ( XP por ej. ) no esta portado a esa plataforma.

... y por supuesto, en mi opinion para ser una verdadera "netbook" deberia costar menos de u$s150 ( u$s70 refurbished ). Veremos que pasa.

viernes, 31 de julio de 2009

Canvas, HTML5 y el WHATWG

Pinta interesante el nuevo elemento "canvas" que el WHATWG (*) proponen para el proximo HTML5 ...

(*) WHATWG: grupo paralelo e independiente al W3C que busca mejorar las tecnologias web

ejemplos:

http://www.canvasdemos.com

http://www.chromeexperiments.com/

Ver los ejemplos con Firefox , Chrome o Safari... la gente de IE fue invitado al WHATWG pero no quiso ir , ojala los de IE se integren para que esto se estandarice rapido !

miércoles, 8 de julio de 2009

miércoles, 3 de diciembre de 2008

M.Moore: Crisis, salvatajes y "the big 3"

Copio a  continuación un mensaje de Michael Moore en su lista publica de correo, donde habla sobre la crisis en USA y hace propuestas alternativas de solución:

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore

Friends,

I drive an American car. It's a Chrysler. That's not an endorsement. It's more like a cry for pity. And now for a decades-old story, retold ad infinitum by tens of millions of Americans, a third of whom have had to desert their country to simply find a damn way to get to work in something that won't break down:

My Chrysler is four years old. I bought it because of its smooth and comfortable ride. Daimler-Benz owned the company then and had the good grace to place the Chrysler chassis on a Mercedes axle and, man, was that a sweet ride!

When it would start.

More than a dozen times in these years, the car has simply died. Batteries have been replaced, but that wasn't the problem. My dad drives the same model. His car has died many times, too. Just won't start, for no reason at all.

A few weeks ago, I took my Chrysler in to the Chrysler dealer here in northern Michigan -- and the latest fixes cost me $1,400. The next day, the vehicle wouldn't start. When I got it going, the brake warning light came on. And on and on.

You might assume from this that I couldn't give a rat's ass about these miserably inept crapmobile makers down the road in Detroit city. But I do care. I care about the millions whose lives and livelihoods depend on these car companies. I care about the security and defense of this country because the world is running out of oil -- and when it
runs out, the calamity and collapse that will take place will make the current recession/depression look like a Tommy Tune musical.

And I care about what happens with the Big 3 because they are moreresponsible than almost anyone for the destruction of our fragile atmosphere and the daily melting of our polar ice caps.

Congress must save the industrial infrastructure that these companies control and the jobs they create. And it must save the world from the internal combustion engine. This great, vast manufacturingnetwork can redeem itself by building mass transit and electric/hybridcars, and the kind of transportation we need for the 21st century.

And Congress must do all this by NOT giving GM, Ford and Chrysler the $34 billion they are asking for in "loans" (a few days ago they only wanted $25 billion; that's how stupid they are -- they don't even know how much they really need to make this month's payroll. If you or I tried to get a loan from the bank this way, not only would we be
thrown out on our ear, the bank would place us on some sort of credit rating blacklist).

Two weeks ago, the CEOs of the Big 3 were tarred and feathered before a Congressional committee who sneered at them in a way far different than when the heads of the financial industry showed up two months earlier. At that time, the politicians tripped over each other in their swoon for Wall Street and its Ponzi schemers who had concocted Byzantine ways to bet other people's money on unregulated credit default swaps, known in the common vernacular as unicorns and fairies.

But the Detroit boys were from the Midwest, the Rust (yuk!) Belt, where they made real things that consumers needed and could touch and buy, and that continually recycled money into the economy (shocking!), produced unions that created the middle class, and fixed my teeth for free when I was ten.

For all of that, the auto heads had to sit there in November and be ridiculed about how they traveled to D.C. Yes, they flew on their corporate jets, just like the bankers and Wall Street thieves did in October. But, hey, THAT was OK! They're the Masters of the Universe! Nothing but the best chariots for Big Finance as they set about to loot
our nation's treasury.

Of course, the auto magnates used be the Masters who ruled the world. They were the pulsating hub that all other industries -- steel, oil, cement contractors -- served. Fifty-five years ago, the president of GM sat on that same Capitol Hill and bluntly told Congress, what's good for General Motors is good for the country. Because, you see, in their minds, GM WAS the country.

What a long, sad fall from grace we witnessed on November 19th when the three blind mice had their knuckles slapped and then were sent back home to write an essay called, "Why You Should Give Me Billions of
Dollars of Free Cash." They were also asked if they would work for a dollar a year. Take that! What a big, brave Congress they are! Requesting indentured servitude from (still) three of the most powerful men in the world. This from a spineless body that won't dare stand up to a disgraced president nor turn down a single funding request for a war that neither they nor the American public support. Amazing.

Let me just state the obvious: Every single dollar Congress gives these three companies will be flushed right down the toilet. There is nothing the management teams of the Big 3 are going to do to convince people to go out during a recession and buy their big, gas-guzzling, inferior products. Just forget it. And, as sure as I am that the Ford family-owned Detroit Lions are not going to the Super Bowl -- ever -- I can guarantee you, after they burn through this $34 billion, they'll be back for another $34 billion next summer.

So what to do? Members of Congress, here's what I propose:

1. Transporting Americans is and should be one of the most important functions our government must address. And because we are facing a massive economic, energy and environmental crisis, the new president and Congress must do what Franklin Roosevelt did when he was faced with a crisis (and ordered the auto industry to stop building cars and
instead build tanks and planes): The Big 3 are, from this point forward, to build only cars that are not primarily dependent on oil and, more importantly to build trains, buses, subways and light rail (a corresponding public works project across the country will build the rail lines and tracks). This will not only save jobs, but create millions of new ones.

2. You could buy ALL the common shares of stock in General Motors for less than $3 billion. Why should we give GM $18 billion or $25 billion or anything? Take the money and buy the company! (You're going to demand collateral anyway if you give them the "loan," and because we know they will default on that loan, you're going to own the  company in the end as it is. So why wait? Just buy them out now.)

3. None of us want government officials running a car company, but there are some very smart transportation geniuses who could be hired to do this. We need a Marshall Plan to switch us off oil-dependent vehicles and get us into the 21st century.

This proposal is not radical or rocket science. It just takes one of the smartest people ever to run for the presidency to pull it off. What  I'm proposing has worked before. The national rail system was inshambles in the '70s. The government took it over. A decade later it was turning a profit, so the government returned it to private/public
hands, and got a couple billion dollars put back in the treasury.

This proposal will save our industrial infrastructure -- and millions of jobs. More importantly, it will create millions more. It literally could pull us out of this recession.

In contrast, yesterday General Motors presented its restructuring proposal to Congress. They promised, if Congress gave them $18 billion now, they would, in turn, eliminate around 20,000 jobs. You read that right. We give them billions so they can throw more Americans out of work. That's been their Big Idea for the last 30 years -- layoff thousands in order to protect profits. But no one ever stopped to ask this question: If you throw everyone out of work, who's going to have the money to go out and buy a car?

These idiots don't deserve a dime. Fire all of them, and take over the industry for the good of the workers, the country and the planet.


What's good for General Motors IS good for the country. Once the country is calling the shots.

Yours,

Michael Moore

MMFlint@aol.com

MichaelMoore.com


P.S. I will be on Keith Olbermann tonight (8pm/10pm/midnight ET) to discuss this further on MSNBC.

miércoles, 3 de septiembre de 2008

Detalles de la proxima version de Ubuntu ( 8.10 )

Polishlinux se tomo el trabajo de chequear(*) como va progresando el Ubuntu 8.10, detallando los principales cambios que se vienen. Con algunos screenshots.

(*) en ingles